New Hybrid Business in the US

Nicole ALIX Social economy manager [vc_btn title= »Download the document  » style= »outline » color= »blue » align= »right » i_icon_fontawesome= »fa fa-file-pdf-o » add_icon= »true » link= »url:http%3A%2F%2Fconfrontations.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2016%2F06%2F2012-07-New-Hybrid-businesses-in-US.pdf||target:%20_blank »] Extract of “Do EU legislation and economic policies act in concert in developing a harmonised business theory for social economy and social enterprise?” A European review from 1990 to 2011 ISTR SIENA CONFERENCE 12 July 2012 Some advocate an even more structured approach, and propose updating corporate law, as in the USA, in order give a clear role to investors. Lindsay M. Baghramyan observes that it was at a September 2006 meeting (“Exploring New Legal Forms and Tax Structures for Social Enterprise Organizations” sponsored by the Aspen Institute, which is a major investor) that the participants discussed whether new legal vehicles are needed or whether existing laws may be used with some adjustments. In ‘for-profit’ organisations, the directors have a duty to act in shareholders’ interest. Too frequently this prioritises profit over capital